Letters to the Editor

Confused by legislator’s response to comments

Following is a letter that I sent to Rep. Sherry Appleton earlier Tuesday.

Dear Rep. Appleton,Thank you for your prompt response to my call to the Legislative Hotline voicing my opposition to same-sex marriage.  However, your response leaves me confused.  Your office wrote:

“In the U.S. tax codes there are 1,044 laws that only currently apply to married couples, not domestic partnerships, et al. Rep. Appleton has always felt that if someone is apart [sic] of our democracy, pays taxes, that they should be allowed all the rights and privileges that all of us are entitled to.”

How can a change to Washington state law affect a person’s treatment under the U.S. tax code, which is a part of federal law? If the proposed law passes, same-sex couples who are recognized as “married” in Washington state would not be recognized as such for the purpose of the U.S. tax code. A cynic might conclude that your argument, while fine sounding, is spurious.

Christopher Moore
Poulsbo

 

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

Read the latest Green Edition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Sep 19 edition online now. Browse the archives.