State to say if KHS is safe site
June 10, 2008 · Updated 7:21 PM
KINGSTON In its ongoing investigation of health risks surrounding the former Nike missile site, the Washington Department of Health has confirmed it will answer a question that the Environmental Protection Agency could not.
The question posed last month: Is North Kitsap School Districts property near the former Nike site safe to build a new high school?
Well be able to address that question to the extent of the data we have, said Wayne Clifford, DOH site assessment manager. Thats one question we will be answering.
In July, EPA officials said although their investigation of the Kingston site turned up low levels of contamination, they could not say what level of risk if any the site posed for a new school.
The DOH, which was petitioned by a concerned citizen last year to investigate specific health risks surrounding the decommissioned site, will take the EPAs study a step further and consider specific details of site use. For instance, the DOH will research how the sites levels of contamination would affect high school students journeying near the former site 180 days a year.
We look at contamination at the site and examine it on a very conservative basis, said Lenford OGarro, DOH public health advisor on the project.
We look more at health based values, he added.
The DOH began its study at the EPAs July 29 meeting in Kingston, with OGarro asking for community input to help with his agencys investigation. But so far, only one resident has returned a completed form, the DOH said.
We have enough to go on, Clifford said, but he added that he does encourage residents to submit additional comments.
The DOH officials also added that they use a variety of resources to gauge community concern, including the forms they distribute, e-mails, phone calls and even letters to the editor in local newspapers.
In this case, OGarro and Clifford said that through a few community members, theyve been able to get a lot of input.
Whats happening is these couple of residents are becoming the voice of others, Clifford said. And weve got a pretty good picture of health concerns.
The EPA and the DOH will be investigating the Nike site for radiation after community members at the July 29 meeting raised concerns that nuclear warheads were possibly stored on the site. The site and nearby wells will be tested for nuclear contamination. However, the idea of testing Spectrum students whose school uses the Nike sites barracks will not be explored, Clifford commented.
At this point, our plan for involvement for the school is to basically make sure they are aware of our health consultation, Clifford said.
The DOH will have a completed report in eight to 10 weeks. After the report is released, residents will have two weeks to provide public input after which the DOH will address the comments. Finally, the health consultation will be submitted to the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, which will also offer its comments. A final draft will be released and a fact sheet offering a synopsis of the consultation will be mailed out to area residents, Clifford said.
Though he wouldnt speculate on the results of the consultation, Clifford said that from the EPAs report that ... theres really nothing jumping out at us.
This is another area that we clearly dont expect to see a health threat, he said. But since there is the concern from the community, well go ahead and do the testing.
The bottom line for the DOH is determining if there are heightened cancer cases in the area surrounding the former missile site, he added.
Residents have expressed a number of concerns, Clifford said. One of the things were going to answer is the question about cancer rates in the community as best we can.
Comment on this story.
So keep your comments:
- Civil
- Smart
- On-topic
- Free of profanity
We ask that all participants own their words by logging in with their Facebook account. It's a simple process that will take seconds and helps keep our comments free of trolls, cranks, and “drive-by” commenters. We reserve the right to remove comments from anyone using screen names, pseudonyms or false identities. Please refer to our Terms of Use for full detail on participating on our site.

